For about two months I lost nearly every online game I played, and I had a very confident theory about why: I didn't know any openings. Everyone else had clearly memorised some clever system and I was just pushing pawns like an idiot.

So I watched opening videos. Loads of them. Sicilian, London, some Italian thing. My results did not move at all.

Then I did something I should have done on day one — I actually opened my own losses and looked at them.

---

What my games actually looked like

Every platform gives you free computer analysis. I ran it on ten losses in a row and read the moment each game turned.

Not one of them was an opening problem. Not one was a clever trap. In nine games out of ten I had simply left a piece where it could be taken for free, and my opponent took it. Sometimes on move 11. Sometimes on move 30.

Ten losses. Nine were pieces I handed over for nothing.

Nobody was outplaying me. I was making donations.

This is apparently the least surprising discovery in chess. Ask any coach what decides games below roughly 1200 rating and they'll say the same thing before you finish the question: material, given away, unforced.

---

"Hanging" — the word for it

A piece is hanging when it's attacked and nothing of yours is defending it. Your opponent can just take it and lose nothing.

It matters because chess has a rough price list, and it's not close:

*Hand over a knight for nothing and you're three pawns down. At beginner level that's usually decisive on its own — no brilliance required from the other side.

Here's what makes this genuinely good news. Openings take months. Endgames take years. Not hanging pieces takes about two weeks of paying attention. It's the highest-return thing you will ever learn in this game and it costs you nothing but the habit.

---

The two questions

This is the whole fix. Two questions, every move, out loud in your head until it's automatic.

After your opponent moves: what does that move now attack?

Not "what are they planning" — you can't read minds and at this level they usually aren't planning anything. Just: what can that piece reach now that it couldn't before?

Before you move: if I play this, is anything of mine left undefended?

The pause before the move. That's the entire technique.

It will feel painfully slow for the first week. You'll lose games on time that you were winning on the board, and that's a fair trade for a bit. Then it stops being a checklist and becomes something you just see, the way you don't consciously read individual letters anymore.

---

Why openings aren't your problem yet

I'm not saying openings don't matter. I'm saying they don't matter yet, and there's a specific reason.

Opening theory is about reaching a position that's very slightly better. Slightly better is worthless if you drop a rook on move 18. It's like optimising your handwriting before you can spell — you're perfecting the wrong layer.

The two opening ideas that are actually worth your time can be written in one line: control the centre, get your pieces out, castle early. Bas. That's genuinely enough for the next few hundred games.

---

Where to practise this for free

Lichess is free, has no ads, no premium tier, and doesn't limit anything. You don't even need an account to solve puzzles.

• Twenty puzzles a day at lichess.org/training. They're taken from real games, so you're training on the exact patterns that decide yours.
• Review one loss properly — run the analysis, find the single move where the evaluation collapsed, and name what you missed. One reviewed loss beats ten fresh games.
• Play 10-minute games while the habit is forming. Speed comes later, and it comes free.

Twenty puzzles a day, on the bus. That's the whole training plan.